Thursday, December 31, 2009

Is yoga a religion?


An interesting legal debate, posted at The Immanent Frame. It arose from a recent legal case in Missouri, in which yoga centers objected to being subject to taxes, on the grounds that they are entitled to religious status.

As the four commenters point out, separating the religions from non-religions can be surprisingly tricky. Isaac Weiner also makes the point that ". . . offering tax exemptions for religious institutions or organizations inevitably entangles government and religion, rather than separating them."

Photo courtesy Flickruser lululemon

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

We use and defend the King James Bible


Bible for Today Baptist Church
Collingswood, New Jersey
September 16, 2007

This church has an interesting ad in the yellow pages. It proclaims “We use and defend the King James Bible.” Well, I thought, who doesn’t? I mean, most churches use a more modern translation of the Bible, but everyone loves the King James Version (KJV). That’s the one with the gorgeous language, the one that has influenced English literature so profoundly. As it turned out, I was about to discover a kind of church I had never heard of before, the King James-only church.

The ad contains other slogans about the church: “Fundamental; separated; Bible Believing”; “Verse by Verse Exposition and Teaching”; “Internet Church Broadcast – Live and On Demand Streaming 24/7”; and “The difference is worth the distance.” So I gathered that the church was using lots of modern technology; they weren’t Luddites, just strong believers in the KJV. I checked out their website.

It’s an incredibly colorful website, was my first thought. Ouch, my eyes! They have a webstore, news updates, a system for making online donations. Was this some kind of big local church I had somehow completely overlooked while driving around the area?

I clicked on a side link, BFT Baptist Church, and scrolled down a bit to find a photo of the pastor, Dr. D.A. Waite (a nice-looking older gentleman), and more information about the church itself. They describe themselves thus: “The Bible For Today Baptist Church is a unique church. We hold to all of the doctrines taught in the Bible that Baptists have always believed. We are a fundamental, independent, unaffiliated, pre-millennial, separated, Bible-believing Baptist church.”

I also discovered that BFT does not meet in a church building, but in the home of Dr. Waite, which is probably why I had never noticed it. According to the website, people drive from over an hour away to come and have “sweet family fellowship” at BFT. In addition, I learned that: “Our pianist, Mr. Dick Carroll, is one of the most accomplished musicians in the United States of America.” (Pretty big claim there – I’ll see about that.) The church uses the Defined King James Bible, a version I’ve never heard of before. This sounds interesting.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

A truly good book teaches me better than to read it. I must soon lay it down, and commence living on its hint. What I began by reading, I must finish by acting. (Thoreau)


I like having ongoing projects – this blog is one of them, and it arose out of my earlier project of visiting a different church every Sunday for a year.

I’ve just begun a new project – reading all the novels Anthony Trollope wrote, in order. I’ve read large chunks of Trollope already (including the complete Palliser series), but it won’t be a hardship to read them again. Large amounts will have been forgotten, and will seem like new – and anyway, re-reading is one of the joys of being a reader.

So I’m one paragraph into his first novel, The MacDermotts of Ballycloran, and already there’s a highly quotable sentence:

There is a kind of gratification in seeing what one has never seen before, be it ever so little worth seeing; and the gratification is the greater if the chances be that one will never see it again.

Ah – spoken like a true traveler. And the sentiment works for those travelers who never get much past their own city or neighborhood as well as for those who seek out faraway lands. (I am reminded of Thoreau’s “I have travelled much in Concord,” and when I Googled that quotation to make sure I had it right, I found the one in the title of this post, which also seems appropriate here.)

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Lydia Davis

I am in love with The Collected Stories of Lydia Davis. If you’ve never heard of her (like me, until about a month ago), you will likely be quite surprised by her work. She writes very, very short stories – some are just one or two lines. Her writing is funny, illuminating, mysterious. She somehow captures the mind in action, something that is hard to describe but wonderful to observe. Her work also accomplishes that most essential and magical work of good fiction – it somehow changes the way I think and see the world. I first noticed this when something happened in my own life, and I was thinking it over, and I suddenly realized that I was thinking like a person in a Lydia Davis story.


No one selection will really illustrate her work well, but here is a bit from “Examples of Confusion”:

Driving in the rain, I see a crumpled brown thing ahead in the middle of the road. I think it is an animal. I feel sadness for it and for all the animals I have been seeing in the road and by the edge of the road. When I come closer, I find that it is not an animal but a paper bag. Then there is a moment when my sadness from before is still there along with the paper bag, so that I appear to feel sadness for the paper bag.

That’s an example of capturing a thought, or emotion, or something, that I know I’ve had but have never been really conscious about, the way feelings bleed into inappropriate situations. Also, for me it brings up the memory of the rainy night my daughter was hit by a car and lying in the street, and then another driver ran over her – he said later that he saw something in the road, and thought it was a garbage bag. Kind of the opposite of what happens in Davis’ story, but surely another example of confusion. (My daughter recovered, by the way, after many months and many surgeries.)

Here's one of the amazon reviews:

Lydia Davis is a rare and wonderful writer, a word master with an uncanny ability to reveal the inner musings of the mind. These are short stories to savor and revisit.

I love this book.

Believing you are right even when you're not

I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things . . . it doesn’t frighten me.


Richard Feynman

Dogmatism is not an attitude found only in believers. Secularists can be dogmatic as well. I have just finished Robert A. Burton's On Being Certain: Believing you are right even when you're not. Burton is a neurologist who has studied the feeling of being certain. Quick summary from the back cover: "An increasing body of evidence suggests that feelings such as certainty stem from primitive areas of the brain and are independent of active, conscious reflection and reasoning.In other words, the feeling of knowing happens to us: we cannot make it happen."
 
Lest you think that this is somehow a put-down of the feeling of certainty, know that Burton is not dismissive of the "primitive areas of the brain," and that the book is not a polemic against belief, but rather what seems to me a very even-handed and eye-opening exploration of what happens when we are certain about anything - whether the belief in question is "I remember where my friend's house is," "I know what happened when the accident occurred," "I believe in God," or "There is no God." He notes that Richard Dawkins' "near-evangelical effort to convince the faithful of the folly of their convictions has the same zealous ring as those missionaries who feel it is their duty to convince the heathen."
 
But it's not all about religious or political belief - mostly fascinating stuff exploring hunches, intuition, the fact that we are blind to much more than we realize - a great read!
 
(Actually, the idea that you can't reason your way to belief, or talk yourself into belief fits in very well with the Christian concept of prevenient grace.)

The 2010 census and the nativity

An ad campaign to get Hispanics to participate in 2010 census, using the gospel story of Jesus’ birth, has been called "blasphemous" by other Latino groups.


This certainly seems like an odd way to get people to participate in the US census. Wasn’t the census as described in the gospels part of the evil Roman empire’s efforts to control their subject populations? Why would you want to associate yourself with that? Plus, the birth of Jesus is closely associated with the Flight to Egypt – the holy family getting out of town fast to avoid the authorities. Again, not a great association to present to members of Hispanic communities who may be wary of government officials.

At any rate, I’ve always thought that the census procedure as described in Luke sounds weird – having everyone go back to their home town to be counted? Why? How long did they have to stay there? What about old, sick, and (obviously) pregnant people? What if a husband and wife were from different towns? It turns out there is lots of scholarly speculation about the two censuses in the gospels (Matthew and Luke), whether they seem to correspond to anything we know about ancient history, and about whether or not it is possible to reconcile the two accounts:

"This passage has long been considered problematic by Biblical scholars, since it places the birth of Jesus around the time of the census in C.E. 6, whereas the Gospel of Matthew indicates a birth during or just after the reign of Herod the Great, who died in 4 B.C.E., ten years earlier. . . In addition, no other sources mention a world-wide (in this context, probably meaning 'the Roman world') census which would cover the population as a whole; those of Augustus covered Roman citizens only; and it was not the practice in Roman censuses to require people to return to their ancestral homes."

and

"Luke's statement that Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem 'because he was descended from the house and family of David' has often been called into question, since it appears to imply that people were required to return to their ancestral home; James Dunn wrote: "the idea of a census requiring individuals to move to the native town of long dead ancestors is hard to credit". . . . A papyrus from Egypt dated C.E. 104 requiring people to return to their homes for a census has sometimes been cited as evidence of a requirement to travel; however, this refers only to migrant workers returning to their family home, not their ancestral home. However, Raymond E. Brown suggested that “One cannot rule out the possibility that, since Romans often adapted their administration to local circumstances, a census conducted in Judea would respect the strong attachment of Jewish tribal and ancestral relationships.”

Source for quotes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_Quirinius

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Nine astonishingly assymetrical buildings

I stumbled across this page (literally, using Stumble). I really like the Walt Disney Concert Hall. It looks as though it came out of The Sorcerer's Apprentice.

Friday, December 11, 2009

Reflexive non-sympathy

I’ve been thinking lately about an attitude you could call reflexive non-sympathy. It’s the attitude that some people seem to feel compelled to exhibit whenever they hear of someone who has had some sort of trouble that is in part or wholly due to that person’s own rotten choices. For example, when they hear of an obese person who loses a leg to diabetes, they immediately respond, “No sympathy here. He ate himself into poor health (and I resent paying his medical bills).” Or if they read about a drunk driver involved in a car accident, their first comment is, “Well, he deserved it. I’m just glad no innocent people were killed by that moron.” These kind of automatic responses are common - I've certainly said stuff like this myself, often enough.


If someone suggests that it’s possible to have even a modicum of sympathy for people who do bad things and make poor choices, the reflexive non-sympathizer is often enraged, as though the sympathizer is trying to convince people that obesity is a good thing or that drunk driving should be winked at.

Really, why should it be so hard to think that many people make very, very poor decisions and do really rotten things and nevertheless are not totally undeserving of some sympathy? It’s not as though this is an either/or situation, where you have to side one way or the other. If you can understand how some people, due to a likely complex set of circumstances, may have become obese, or alcoholics, or drug addicts, or debtors, or just general screw-ups, that doesn’t mean you think that obesity, alcoholism, drug addiction, bad spending habits, or stupidity are good things. It doesn’t mean you think they should escape the consequences of their actions, or that they should be celebrated as poor, poor victims. It just means that you can see how the situation might be a little more complex than “What an idiot. Off with his head!”

I can think of four reasons behind the barking of the reflexive non-sympathizer. 1) He or she believes in the value of stigma, and fears that showing any shred of sympathy for people who fail may weaken society (if we show any sympathy for compulsive gamblers, everyone will want to gamble); 2) he or she cannot imagine personally being so weak as to fail in these ways, yet even the thought of being so weak is terrifying and must be defended against, publically and immediately; 3) he or she may have been personally traumatized by someone who has done this bad thing, and desire others to hate and punish everyone who does these bad things; 3) he or she is hopeful that somehow life will be fair if a position of stern personal goodness is maintained (I don’t overeat or use drugs or abuse alcohol or spend irresponsibly or engage in immoral activity or treat people badly, so I will be OK. Bad things can and should happen to people who do all those bad things, but I should be safe.)

I’m also mystified a bit at the reflexive non-sympathizer’s sense that sympathy can be wasted – as though it is a tangible commodity, limited in supply, and that “spending” this commodity on the undeserving will somehow result in there being less of it available for the deserving. This seems almost like magical thinking – not least because it seems to assume that the undeserving will mystically benefit from sympathy felt by an unknown person.

The reflexive non-sympathizer reminds me of the student who doesn’t see the point of reading literature. I came across these students quite regularly. Their attitude was something like, “Why would I want to read about a loser like MacBeth, or Madame Bovary, or Raskolnikov, or Jay Gatsby? They are idiots who made a hash of their lives and deserved what they got.” Some students didn’t seem able to grasp the concept that it is quite possible to think that all the great losers of literature are not being held up as role models to emulate, but as case studies in understanding the human psyche – and that you can condemn their decisions and actions and yet also feel some sympathy for them when you understand how they came to be the type of person who does those bad things.

But, no. For them it just has to be X is bad, therefore anyone who does X is a bad person. No sympathy. End of story. Nothing to learn here. (Or anywhere, I fear.)

Friday, December 4, 2009

“it’s very unfortunate that Darwin was a white Brit”

In the Muslim world, creationism is increasingly popular. Oddly, from our point of view, it appeals to the modernizing Muslims, who want to do well in the global economy and at the same time stick to traditional values. Interesting analysis!

Cloud Nine is now Cloud Ten


I’ve been reading The Cloudspotter’s Guide: The Science, History and Culture of Clouds, by Gavin Pretor-Pinney. Pretor-Pinney is described on the back cover as “a former science nerd” who “has been obsessed with clouds since childhood.” He’s the founder of The Cloud Appreciation Society. Click on the link to see some great cloud photos (they make nice background photos for your computer screen) and lots of information.

The Cloudspotter’s Guide is the best kind of popular science book – fun to read, full of learning but not ponderously so, and about a really fascinating subject. I love reading about ordinary stuff I never really thought about before (the prime example of this kind of thing would be The Secret Life of Dust, an absolutely riveting book about . . . dust). It’s one of those books that, while you’re reading it, you constantly want to turn to someone and say, “Hey, listen to this. Did you know . . . . . .”

Cloud nomenclature began in the early 1800s, when a Quaker amateur meteorologist named Luke Howard proposed a classification system for clouds similar to the Linnean system in botany and zoology. In 1896 a Swedish meteorologist and an English one formed a Cloud Committee to develop an international system of cloud classification. This committee published The International Cloud Atlas. “Now published by the World Meteorological Organization, it is the undisputed authority on cloud classification, and a book that any serious cloudspotter should own,” according to Pretor-Pinney.

In the original 1896 edition, there were ten cloud genera, and Cumulonimbus clouds held the number nine spot. Cumulonimbus are thunderclouds, which can extend up to summits at 60,000 feet or more (taller than Mount Everest). So to be “on cloud nine” was to be on the very tallest cloud – up in the stratosphere.

As early as the second edition of the Cloud Atlas, though, the genera were rearranged, and Cumulonimbus was reassigned to the number ten spot. This didn’t matter to popular culture, of course. The phrase “on cloud nine” turned out to be a very sticky meme.

Sort of related: one of my favorite songs is the rather little-known “Cloudy” from Simon and Garfunkel’s Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme album.

Photo courtesy Flickruser kevindooley

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Find us, and ye shall seek




Unitarian Universalist Church
Cherry Hill, New Jersey
September 9, 2007

Time to get back to visiting places that are more foreign to my experience. I’ve never been to a Unitarian Universalist (UU) church; the closest I’ve been to Unitarianism was the class I took on Ralph Waldo Emerson. A dizzying experience it was, too. If modern Unitarians are as mysterious, allusive, elusive, and just generally confounding as Emerson, visiting a UU church will be a strange trip indeed.

I do a little Wikiwork to prepare. According to Wiki, Unitarian Universalists are not united by creed, but rather united in their “shared search for spiritual growth.” They do not consider themselves Christians, though they trace their history back to the 1961 merger of two traditionally Christian groups, the Universalist Church in America and the American Unitarian Association. (So I think this will be the youngest denomination so far in my visits, dating back to only 1961.)

Of course, some of the churches I’ve visited so far are called non-Christian by other Christian groups. Many people who consider themselves Christians would tell me that Mormons and Christian Scientists are not Christians, and you could find someone somewhere who would say that anyone not in his or her denomination is non Christian. But visiting the UUs will be the first time I’m visiting a church that does not claim the Christian label for themselves.

Universalism, the belief that everyone will eventually be saved, is a very old doctrine. People find it in the writings of the earliest theologians, including Origen (second century), and St. Gregory of Nyssa (4th century). In the US, the Universalist Church of America was established in 1793, so it seems to me that you could say that the idea that no one will go to hell is real American “old-time religion.”

Unitarianism, the rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity, has been around a long, long time also. That’s not really very surprising, since Christianity arose out of Judaism, and it’s harder to get more adamantly monotheistic than Judaism.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Feeling thrinchy

It sounds a little Scroogey or Grinchy to post Thanksgiving caveats - (thrinchy?), but the holiday is so bound up with national history and pride that it would be a healthy thing, I think, to throw a little humility and atonement into the mix. Those Pilgrim forefathers and foremothers, after all, were an early warning of a tidal wave of misery and genocide for Native Americans. I think it's possible to be both proud of your history and ashamed of it at the same time.

For an interesting Catholic take on the spirit of thrinchiness, see Michael J. Iafrate's post, "Are you pro-life? Resist or subvert Thanksgiving," at his blog,  catholicanarchy.org.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

We Gather Together



So of course we sang We Gather Together in church this week, and I noticed again how wonderfully rhymey this song is: 6 lines with internal rhyme (chastens/hastens; ordaining/maintaining, etc.) and 8 with end rhyme, and several with both: an astonishing total of 11 out of 12 lines that have at least one kind of rhyme! I can’t think of another hymn that is so amazingly chock-full of rhyme – this hymn rivals Edgar Allen Poe (and Dr. Seuss) in that respect.

But I also saw that it is a Dutch hymn, dating back to the end of the 16th century, and realized that I didn’t have any idea about who the “wicked oppressing” were, what fight was being won from the beginning, or what tribulation the congregation was escaping. I had a vague idea that the hymn is about the Pilgrims, but I suddenly realized that this notion was probably based more on the fact that we sing this hymn on Thanksgiving than on history. So I looked it up.

Interesting stuff. Like many hymns, the melody comes from a folk song, "Wilder dan wilt, wie sal mij temmen." Translated, this is "Wilder than wild, who will tame me?" I wish I could find the translation of the rest of those lyrics, because the first line is terrific!

An unknown Dutchman wrote new lyrics to the folk melody after the 1597 Battle of Turnhout, which was the first time the Dutch had defeated their Spanish conquerors, who forbad Protestant gatherings -- so the first three words celebrate a very subversive activity. It must have been something of a thrill just to get together and sing the first line.
Did American Pilgrims know this song? There’s no proof that they did, but many people think it is probable, given their close ties to the Dutch community. If they did sing it, though, they would not have done so in church. Both in the Netherlands and in the New World, their congregations were strict Psalm-singers; that is, they sang only Psalms, without instrumental accompaniment.

We Gather Together first appeared in an American hymnal in 1903, and then showed up in various hymnals and school songbooks (it used to be taught in public school music classes) in the Northeast and Midwest. According to Carl Daw, executive director of the Hymn Society, this hymn’s "big break" came in 1935, when it was added to the national hymnal of the Methodist-Episcopal Church. (I love the concept of a hymn getting a “big break.” Perhaps Morning Has Broken got its big break when Cat Stevens recorded it. Related joke: Morning has broken. I think Dawn had something to do with it. Make her clean it up.)

The Dutch-American community was late to adopt this most famous Dutch hymn for their services, due to their tradition of Psalm-singing only. Finally, in 1937, 340 years after We Gather Together had been penned, the Christian Reformed Church in North America decided to allow hymns to be sung in worship services – a controversial decision at the time. We Gather Together was chosen as the opening hymn in the denomination’s first hymnal.

We Gather Together became increasingly popular in the United States, especially during the two World Wars. “The wicked oppressing” were often associated with the Germans and the Japanese in the popular mind, and that final heartfelt “O Lord, make us free!” resonated with the national mood.
My haphazard researches into the churches I visited during my church visiting project continually reminded me of how thoroughly religious identity and national identity are mingled. Nothing is more like hymn singing than patriotic song singing. Almost every denomination has a national or ethnic component that is either overt (Greek Orthodox; Dutch Reformed; African Methodist; Anglican) or understood (Lutheran churches almost always began as German/Scandinavian congregations; Roman Catholic parishes, at least in Philadelphia, are often identified ethnically, as a Polish parish, an Italian parish, a Czech parish, etc.). Each denomination faces the challenge of honoring and remaining true to their national/ethnic roots while at the same time welcoming newcomers and outsiders. The history of We Gather Together is a little microcosm of how a song that expresses an intensely nationalistic/religious struggle can morph over the centuries into an expression of the national/religious pride of an entirely different people, a nation that didn’t even exist when the song was first written.

We Gather Together

We gather together to ask the Lord's blessing;
He chastens and hastens His will to make known;
The wicked oppressing now cease from distressing,
Sing praises to His name: He forgets not his own.

Beside us to guide us, our God with us joining,
Ordaining, maintaining His kingdom divine
So from the beginning the fight we were winning;
Thou, Lord, wast at our side, All glory be thine!

We all do extol thee, thou leader triumphant,
And pray that thou still our defender wilt be.
Let thy congregation escape tribulation;
Thy name be ever praised! O Lord, make us free!

Sources for this post include Melanie Kirkpatrick’s article in the Wall Street Journal, “The surprising origins of 'We Gather Together,' a Thanksgiving standard."


Photo courtesy Flickruser maveric2003.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

God said it; I interpreted it . . . .

That doesn't exactly settle it.


I agree with Brant Hansen: this may be the best Christian tee-shirt ever.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

What do we do with the fraud lasting for 28 years now?


Byzantine Rambler has a post on something that hasn't been well covered in the mainstream press, the Medjugorge Marian apparitions. I'm glad to see that the Pope has spoken out on this. The political ramifications are complex and fascinating; I had no idea that massacres of Jews, Gypsies, Serbs, and Croats were so closely connected to the area of the so-called apparition. This reminds me a bit of George Fox's "Woe to bloody Litchfield" vision, which I wrote about in this post. Perhaps there is a connection between "supernatural" phenomena and unresolved guilt and anger. I cannot presume to understand the complex interactions of sorrow, guilt, and spiritual desire involved. This Pope is courageous in addressing the issue.

Photo courtesy Flickruser C1ssou

Some people fit more into a day than others



1903 in the life of erratic pitcher Rube Waddell, cataloged by Cooperstown historian Lee Allen:


“He began that year sleeping in a firehouse in Camden, New Jersey, and ended it tending bar in a saloon in Wheeling, West Virginia. In between those events he won 22 games for the Philadelphia Athletics, played left end for the Business Men’s Rugby Football Club of Grand Rapids, Michigan, toured the nation in a melodrama called The Stain of Guilt, courted, married and became separated from May Wynne Skinner of Lynn, Massachusetts, saved a woman from drowning, accidentally shot a friend through the hand, and was bitten by a lion.”

It's the Michigan business men playing rugby in 1903 that's so hard to figure.


Photo courtesy Flickuser Wigstruck

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Being a pastor — a high-profile, high-stress job with nearly impossible expectations for success — can send one down the road to depression, according to pastoral counselors.

Article on pastors commiting suicide, in USA Today.

:"Those who counsel pastors say Christian culture, especially Southern evangelicalism, creates the perfect environment for depression. Pastors suffer in silence, unwilling or unable to seek help or even talk about it. Sometimes they leave the ministry. Occasionally the result is the unthinkable."

And:

"You can't talk about it before it happens and you can't talk about it after it happens," said Monty Hale, director of pastoral ministries for the South Carolina Baptist Convention.

Very sad.

Pew etiquette


I often mused on the subject of pew etiquette during my year of visiting churches, partly because I was consciously trying to observe how people in various congregations “did church,” and partly because, as a constant newcomer, I was a little worried about violating unknown rules.

I’m not talking about sitting in the wrong pew. Everyone has heard jokes about that – visitors sit in the fourth pew from the front on the left, and the family that usually sits there every week is offended and discombobulated – someone is sitting in OUR pew! Oh no - what should we do? I suspect that I was guilty of usurping someone’s accustomed seat on one or two occasions during my year of visiting, but it couldn’t have been much of a problem in most churches, since almost all of them had plenty of empty pews to spare. But some churches had a healthy number of folks sitting in the pews, and those are the occasions when I observed the kind of bad pew etiquette that bothers me.

Ten minutes before the service begins, most churches have a seating pattern that looks like the diagram above.

Everyone who arrives after this must either sit in the three empty pews at the front (which no one wants to do), or petition the Defenders of the Aisle Seats for admittance. Most pews are placed so close together that you can’t walk past the people on the ends to get to the middle. The Defenders sometimes get up and stand on the side, enabling newcomers to walk to the middle. More polite folks don’t force the newcomers to the middle of the pew -- they slide toward the middle themselves.

Then there is the problem of inadequate pew-sliding. How many times have I witnessed this ridiculous pantomime! For example, say there is a family of three sitting on the aisle, and another family of three comes along and begs permission to please sit down. The first family politely scootches over to give the second family a place to sit.

Only – and this seems to happen EVERY SINGLE TIME – they never scootch over enough. The person farthest from the aisle moves over about the distance of one and one half butt cheeks, and the next person follows suit, except a little less, and so forth. The first member of the second family then tries to sit down, but it’s a tight fit, and then the first family begins another round of unsatisfactory scootching, and this is followed by a third or fourth round, until finally both families are seated. They are usually still too close to each other, and as soon as everyone rises for the first hymn, the whole gaggle takes another step to the left or right, depending on which side of the aisle they are on, and finally everyone is sitting in some semblance of comfort. AND THEN THIS HAPPENS AGAIN NEXT WEEK.

Therefore, I have advice for churches that would like to be more visitor-friendly, from the perspective of a constant visitor.

Unless you know perfectly well that you will have plenty of empty pews available at every service, why not ask people to scootch over toward the middle of the pew if they arrive first? Make it easy for people to find a seat, visitors and members alike. Don’t have every pew blocked on both ends by the Defenders of the Aisle Seats. It’s discouraging, and unfriendly, and really, really unnecessary.

And, of course, it will never change.

The least, the last, and the lost


First United Methodist Church

Collingswood, New Jersey
September 2, 2007


This week I tried another Methodist church. I had intended to branch out further afield, but I procrastinated and finally just chose a church very close to our apartment, one that wouldn’t necessitate looking up driving directions: First United Methodist Church of Collingswood. I knew where it was, and I knew that they have an 8:30 service, so I just drove over there a few minutes before the service began.

First United Methodist Church of Collingswood is an attractive stone structure in a quiet residential area, featuring a big square bell tower and large stained glass windows. I think I’m beginning to be able to date some of these churches at first sight. I’ll bet this one was built around the turn of the nineteenth century – it looks of that era. 1890 through 1930 seem to have been years when many large, impressive churches were constructed in this area, built of blocks of massive stone, usually with bell towers and gorgeous stained glass. And most of those big churches also have an addition attached, an education building added to the sanctuary in the 1950s or 1960s, around the time of the last big surge in church membership in America. First United Methodist of Collingswood looks as though it fits that pattern.

A hand-lettered sign outside the building tells me that the 8:30 service features contemporary worship. I notice that there is no parking lot – another good indicator that my guess about the church’s founding date is correct.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Giving the children's bread to dogs



On August 8 I was in Lancaster, Pennsylvania visiting my daughter and grandchildren, and I did not have a car or an easy way to get to any church on Sunday morning. So I decided to try television religious shows. I didn’t have a chance to do any research ahead of time, on the Internet or in any other way. I just turned on the television and looked for religious programming. The first one I found was a local broadcast: “Stand Up for Jesus,” featuring Pastor Buddy Flosser, pastor of Faith Tabernacle in Lancaster.

When the program begins we see Pastor Flosser in the pulpit,; his first words are “Greetings, everyone, in the wonderful name of Jesus.” There is some kind of shadowy background behind him. He informs us that this show is a ministry that his father began, and which he is now trying to continue. He lets viewers know that they can come see him preach at Faith Tabernacle at 2:00 pm on Sundays. The reason for the late service time is that he also pastors another church, in Havre de Grace, Maryland – Bethel Apostolic Church. That is a rough traveling schedule!

He asks viewers to send in prayer requests, and also lets us know that we can request prayer cloths. He reminds us that the program is a faith ministry and needs our financial support. He notes that giving money to the program will bring heavenly rewards: “You will be right there when the rewards are given out, because you helped us stay on the air.”

Sunday, September 27, 2009

There is a very, very fine line between effective children's ministry... and pure, unmitigated terror.

Photo here.

If you have never checked out Brant Hansen's blog, please do - funniest religious blog I know.

What does it feel like to be alive?



Living, you stand under a waterfall. . . . The hard water pelts your skull, bangs in bits on your shoulder and arms. . . . . It is time pounding at you, time. Knowing you are alive is watching on every side your generation's short time falling away as fast as rivers drop through air, and feeling it hit.

From Annie Dillard's An American Childhood. A great read. The best review is from the Chicago Tribune: ".it more than takes the reader's breath away. It consumes you as you consume it, so that, when you have put down this book, you're a different person, one who has virtually experienced another childhood."

Yes.

Photo courtesy Flickruser big-ashb.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

{God} tends to thicken things rather than render them self-evident

Religious fundamentalism is the neurotic anxiety that without a Meaning of meanings, there is no meaning at all. It is simply the flip side of nihilism. Underlying this assumption is the house-of-cards view of life: flick away the one at the bottom, and the whole fragile structure comes fluttering down. Someone who thinks this way is simply the prisoner of a metaphor. In fact, a great many believers reject this view. No sensitive, intelligent religious believer imagines that non-believers are bound to be mired in total absurdity. Nor are they bound to believe that because there is a God, the meaning of life becomes luminously clear. On the contrary, some of those with religious faith believe that God's presence makes the world more mysteriously unfathomable, not less. If he does have a purpose, it is remarkably impenetrable. God is not in that sense the answer to a problem. He tends to thicken things rather than render them self-evident.

From Terry Eagleton's The Meaning of Life

Love this paragraph. I'm often amazed at how people think that religious belief makes everything easier, and that this is its appeal. For me, religion generally makes stuff harder. It would seem rather easy to account for things like tsunamis and the Holocaust and the suffering of children and animals if you suppose there is no God. The really tough thing is accounting for stuff like that if you posit a loving God.

Plus, that whole house-of-cards idea, although most people who accept that type of metaphor would argue that the underlying support is not a flimsy card but rather an invincible Rock. But all too often their supposed basic principle without which everything else falls is something like the One True Church Which Has Never Been Wrong or the The Inerrant Scriptures Which Contain No Contradictions, Errors, or Flubs. These ideas are just so obviously easy to refute that you have to almost admire as well as pity the incredible intellectual contortions they undergo in order to stick with those views.

Next up in the Church Visiting series



Giving the children’s bread to dogs
In Lancaster, PA, with no car available, I stay home and watch a religious television program, Stand Up for Jesus with Pastor Buddy Flosser. I send away for a prayer cloth.

Reach out to the least, the last, and the lost
I attend the First United Methodist Church of Collingswood, NJ, where I hear a sermon on the need to minister to others.

Find us, and ye shall seek
I attend the Unitarian Universalist Church of Cherry Hill, NJ, where I participate in a water ceremony and learn how mean and narrow-minded denominational Christians are.

We use and defend the King James Bible
I attend the Bible for Today Baptist Church in Collingswood, NJ, where the service is held in the pastor’s living room and simultaneously webcast on the Internet. I learn that the King James Bible is the only version that contains the accurate Word of God, hear some great gospel piano, have my photograph taken by the pastor’s wife, and am given a book of poetry written by the pastor’s wife’s mother.

Photo courtesy Flickruser seir+seir+seir

Thursday, September 24, 2009

If I could hie to Kolob

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cherry Hill, New Jersey
August 19, 2007

I didn’t have time to do my usual cursory research into another denomination this week, so I decided to give the Mormons another go, having failed to attend a complete service the first time I tried, about a month ago. I’m sorry to report that again I failed.

Once more I tried to find information about the meeting times on the Internet. Once more, no luck. It seemed to me that last time I had arrived about a half hour into the service, so I thought 9:30 might be a good time to show up.

Monday, September 14, 2009

13 things that do not make sense


I' m not really a science geek, but I just love articles like this one, from New Scientist.

The first thing in the article that does not make sense, the placebo effect, is always interesting. The homeopathy thing is really interesting, too - if true. 

Now if science could just explain why people continue to try arguing with people who aren't interested in listening to anyone else . . . . . .


Photo courtesy Flickruser kaibara87

Friday, September 11, 2009

I was moved in the Lord's power to thresh their chaffy, light minds, part three

I returned to Fox’s Journal after my visit to the Haddonfield Friends Meeting. What an age his was! Everywhere he travels in England, people are holding meetings (often in fields as well as indoors), disputing about religious ideas, and getting all riled up about religion in general. In fact, it reminds me of the kind of thing we read about today in Islamic countries, wherein crowds of people seem ready to drop everything and participate in religious demonstrations on a moment’s notice.

Fox is struck blind every so often, a condition he passes over with amazing nonchalance – he seems to regard it as one of the occupational hazards of a wandering prophet. He is given messages to reform the three great professions: medicine, the law, and divinity. He sees the light of God in all people. He is called to bring the adherents of all sects and religions to the truth.

I was moved in the Lord's power to thresh their chaffy, light minds, part two



The Haddonfield Friends meetinghouse is a brick building in a quiet, shady residential neighborhood, with a very pleasant cemetery across the road, featuring lovely old trees and small, inconspicuous gravestones. The church operates a private school for grades pre-kindergarten through eighth grade; private schools run by Quakers are very popular in this area of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. They have terrific reputations for academic excellence, and are usually quite expensive.

There are about twenty or so cars in the parking lot when I arrive. I notice that quite a few have bumper stickers (which is noticeable only because bumper stickers seem to have gone out of fashion in the last decade or so). These are Obama 08 stickers, and there are a couple that read “Thou shalt not kill” and “End the war.” Those certainly seem like good Quaker sentiments.

I was moved in the Lord's power to thresh their chaffy, light minds, part one


Haddonfield Friends Meeting
Haddonfield, NJ
August 12, 2007

What did I know about Quakers before attending this meeting? Unless eating lots of Quaker Oats oatmeal counts for something, not a lot. Most of what I did know was rather haphazard. I knew that George Fox was the group’s founder. I knew that the term Quaker had been applied to them derisively, because early members of the group shivered or “quaked” during meetings. I knew that Quakers had been among the important leaders in the Abolitionist movement in the US and England, that they are pacifists, and that their worship meetings consist mostly of stretches of silence, broken by people standing up and speaking as they are led of God – no sermon and no preacher. I knew that they believed in plain dress and, historically, addressed each other using the antiquated terms thee and thou.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Nostalgia

In the dumbest movie they can play it on us with a sunrise and a passage of adagio Vivaldi --
all the reason more to love it and to loathe it, this always barely choked-back luscious flood,
this turbulence in breast and breath that indicates a purity residing somewhere in us,
redeeming with its easy access the thousand lapses of memory shed in the most innocuous day
and canceling our rue for all the greater consciousness we didn’t have for past, lost presents.
Its illusion is that we’ll retain this new, however hammy past more thoroughly than all before,
its reality that though we know by heart its shabby ruses, know we’ll misplace it yet again,
it’s what we have, a stage light flickering to flood, chintz and gaud, and we don’t care.

C.K. Williams

Who doesn’t love a big dose of nostalgia, even though some other part of us simultaneously tries to resist its allure? Williams’ description – “this always barely choked-back luscious flood” – is so apt. Try as we will to seize the day, be here now, be mindful of the present, we know we’re constantly losing our past – the “lost presents” – every hour and every minute. Life – it’s all we have, and it’s always slipping away from us. So, even though “we know we’ll misplace it yet again . . . we don’t care.” This little poem is so good.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

God always gets left off the hook. Always, always, always.

The Slapdash Godliness of a Good Girl is an interesting blog, written by a young woman who says "I may be in the process of de-converting from my once-strong Christian faith."

I'm not sure where she is now in her journey, as she hasn't posted for some time, but I will never forget the post in which she compares God to an abusive husband/boyfriend, "The blindness of the abused."

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Though I speak in the tongues of men and angels

After posting about the worship service at Kingsway Church in Cherry Hill, I thought a bit more about my personal history with Assemblies of God churches and with pentecostalism in general. In the early 1970s, when our little group of enthusiastic and ill-informed Jesus people were trying to learn more about Christianity, we were welcomed warmly and kindly by several small pentecostal churches in the area - southern Illinois. To understand how odd this was, you'd have to realize that southern Illinois is very southern. It has much more in common with nearby Kentucky and with the Missouri Ozarks than with Chicago. The members of these local, mostly independent churches were sometimes mocked even by other southern Illinoisans as hillbillies and rednecks. Most members of these churches had only a high school education (or less), and many were coal miners.

And into their churches we wandered - a group of long-haired hippies from the local university, who wanted to know more about Jesus.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Here comes my Lord, on the cross



Kingsway Assembly of God
Cherry Hill, NJ
August 5, 2007


Kingsway Church is an Assemblies of God congregation, but you might not guess that from the home page of their website or from the Sunday bulletin. Like many churches striving to use contemporary methods to reach people, Kingsway seems to be downplaying its denominational ties a bit.


I wanted to include a Pentecostal church in my first group of visits, and AG churches are the group I think of first in this category. I was already somewhat familiar with AG churches – I was married in one, even though neither Neil nor I were members (the pastor who married us was named Billy Sunday!), and I’ve known quite a few AG folks.

Our Father-Mother God, all-harmonious




First Church of Christ, Scientist
Haddonfield, NJ
July 29, 2007


I did not attend church – any church – on July 22, 2007. I was in Boston working at a conference. While in Boston, though, I caught a glimpse of the Mother Church of the Church of Christ, Scientist – an impressive structure. I decided then and there to make the local Christian Science church my next visit.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Failure

Maybe it’s not as bad as we like to think: no melodramatic rendings, sackcloths, nothing so acute
as the fantasies of conscience chart in their uncontrollably self-punishing rigors and admonitions.
Less love, yes, but what was love: a febrile, restless, bothersome trembling to continue to possess
what one was only partly certain was worth wanting anyway, and if the reservoir of hope is depleted,
neither do distracting expectations interfere with these absorbing meditations on the frailties of chance.
A certain resonance might be all that lacks: the voice spinning out in darkness in an empty room.
The recompense is knowing that at last you’ve disconnected from the narratives that conditioned you
to want to be what you were never going to be, while here you are still this far from “the end.”


C.K. Williams

Here’s a bit of cold comfort – maybe failure isn’t so bad. It probably has its own recompenses, like the ability to give up trying to gain something that you suspected might not be worth having anyway, and the relaxation of being able to disconnect “from all the narratives that conditioned you to want to be what you were never going to be.”

I can see that. Boy, can I see it. I’ve done things just because I was “conditioned to want to be something I was never going to be.” The biggest example might be the years I spent trying to convince myself that I really loved academia.

Julie Neidlinger, who writes at Lone Prairie, has an interesting poem that looks at the same idea from another perspective -- inability to accept failure. What do I do when I "can't let go of what I never had"?

I know that concreteness and specificity are prized in poetry, but what I like about both these poems by two completely different kinds of poets is that they are so unspecific – you can imagine them talking about numberless kinds of failures and disappointments.

I also like them because they work well with several of Gretchen Rubin’s Secrets of Adulthood:
  • You can choose what you do; you can't choose what you LIKE to do.
  • You don't have to be good at everything.
  • If you're not failing, you're not trying hard enough.
Finally, I need to apologize because I don't know how to make CK Williams' poem look right on Blogger. Those lines should be longer, running across the page in a loose-limbed, raggedy fashion.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Depression is nature’s way of telling you that you’ve got complex social problems that the mind is intent on solving



". . . depression is nature’s way of telling you that you’ve got complex social problems that the mind is intent on solving. Therapies should try to encourage depressive rumination rather than try to stop it, and they should focus on trying to help people solve the problems that trigger their bouts of depression. (There are several effective therapies that focus on just this.) It is also essential, in instances where there is resistance to discussing ruminations, that the therapist try to identify and dismantle those barriers.

When one considers all the evidence, depression seems less like a disorder where the brain is operating in a haphazard way, or malfunctioning. Instead, depression seems more like the vertebrate eye—an intricate, highly organized piece of machinery that performs a specific function."

Very interesting article in The Scientific American on the possible value of depression. The odd thing is that the researchers seem to have found that depression helps people think - I thought it was just the opposite.


Photo courtesy Flickruser Photos8


Saturday, August 22, 2009

Abandoned church photography


A "new" genre - maybe not so new, since abandoned churches have been with us for centuries, and photography is not such a new medium any more.

Click here to see a really great example.

At least one of the churches I visited during my year of visiting churches was teetering on the edge of becoming a magnificent ruin.


Photo courtesy Flickruser craigfinlay.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Three Beautiful Things

3. Philip K. Dick says, “Any seeming reality that is obliging…is something to suspect. The hallmark of the fraudulent is that it becomes what you would like it to be.” Disappointment, he says, is “the stamp of authenticity.” As I type the quotations, my shoulders convulse with a chill: though I am alone tonight, I imagined there was a child in the room and I was reading him those words.

I have also been writing down Three Beautiful Things in my daily journal, as has Richard Lawrence Cohen, whose Beautiful Thing #3 from July 29 is quoted above.

Disappointment is the stamp of authenticity. Good God, that makes me shiver, too. And then to add the idea of a child in the room. Arghhhhhhhh.

Reminds me of one of my favorite quotations, Philip Larkin writing about "fulfillment's desolate attic."

How disappointing it is to get what we thought we wanted. Better to be continually striving for the unattainable.

Finally, I highly recommend the practice of writing down three beautiful things every day. It makes every day more fun.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Want to tweet God?

Go here.

I'm trying to think of what I would tweet if I had only one tweet to God, 140 characters or less.

God be merciful to me, a sinner.

That might be a good start.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Stupid or evil

I’ve been getting discouraged about how easy it is to jump to the conclusion that anyone who disagrees with us must be either stupid or evil. Perhaps this is an artifact of believing something passionately. If you are whole-heartedly on one side of the debate (any debate), it just seems downright impossible that anyone in his or her right mind could see things in a contrary way.

This habit of seeing opponents as either stupid or evil is being pretty well demonstrated at present in the debates on health care reform. Passionate people on both sides are declaring that folks on the other side must be invincibly ignorant – or else downright evil. They either don’t realize how bad the health care system is now, or don’t realize how terrible it will be if we make these changes – or they do realize, and are just plain evil. They actually want to deprive people of health care, under one system or the other, out of sheer evilness. Bastards.

Theological debates, which you might think would be governed by more civility, all too often fall into the same “stupid or evil” trap. Folks who have strong convictions on a topic such as women’s ordination, or predestination, or baptism, or various social issues simply can’t believe that anyone who looks at the scriptures with a modicum of logic and common sense could disagree. They think, “You seem like a nice, sincere person, so I have to believe that you will eventually come to see things my way, since it’s really the only way that makes any sense. Either that, or . . . . you’re evil.”

It generally seems nicer to believe in the stupidity of others. That is, people who disagree with you just haven’t read the right books, or looked at the scriptures hard enough, or aren’t quite up to snuff in the brains department. If they were just a little bit smarter, or examined the issue a little bit longer, they would surely agree with you and your church. Well, unless they’re evil.

It’s hard to talk to people who think you are either stupid or evil. Conversation is not so much “Let me hear what you have to say on this, and maybe I can understand it better,” but “Let’s talk about this until you see that I am right.”

Wild Gratitude

Tonight when I knelt down next to our cat, Zooey,
And put my fingers into her clean cat’s mouth,
And rubbed her swollen belly that will never know kittens,
And watched her wriggle onto her side, pawing the air,
And listened to her solemn little squeals of delight,
I was thinking about the poet, Christopher Smart,
Who wanted to kneel down and pray without ceasing
In every one of the splintered London streets,

And was locked away in the madhouse at St. Luke’s
With his sad religious mania, and his wild gratitude,
And his grave prayers for the other lunatics,
And his great love for his speckled cat, Jeoffrey,
All day today—August 13, 1983---I remembered how
Christopher Smart blessed this same day in August, 1759,
For its calm bravery and ordinary good conscience.

This was the day that he blessed the Postmaster General
“And all conveyancers of letters” for their warm humanity,
And the gardeners for their private benevolence
And intricate knowledge of the language of flowers,
And the milkmen for their universal human kindness.
This morning I understood that he loved to hear---
As I have heard—the soft clink of milk bottles
On the rickety stairs in the early morning,

And how terrible it must have seemed
When even this small pleasure was denied him.
But it wasn’t until tonight when I knelt down
And slipped my hand into Zooey’s waggling mouth
That I remembered how he’d called Jeoffry “the servant
Of the Living God duly and daily serving Him,”
And for the first time understood what it meant.
Because it wasn’t until I saw my own cat

Whine and roll over on her fluffy back
That I realized how gratefully he had watched
Jeoffry fetch and carry his wooden cork
Across the grass in the wet garden, patiently
Jumping over a high stick, calmly sharpening
His claws on the woodpile, rubbing his nose
Against the nose of another cat, stretching, or
Slowly stalking his traditional enemy, the mouse,
A rodent, “a creature of great personal valour,”
And then dallying so much that his enemy escaped.

And only then did I understand
It is Jeoffry---and every creature like him---
Who can teach us how to praise---purring
In their own language,
Wreathing themselves in the living fire.

Edward Hirsch

I love this poem for so many reasons, and I'm so happy to be able to post it today, August 13, 2009 - because the poet is writing it on August 13, 1983, thinking about poor Christopher Smart, who blessed this same day in 1759. This puts me in mind of my new habit of reading diary entries from the last four centuries, and also reminds me that in some ways little has changed in the last 260 years.

People still love their cats (I miss Felix, our good gray cat, dead these 4 years), people still feel wild gratitude for the simplest things in life, like the sound of milk bottles clinking in the morning, and good people still suffer from mental illness.

Sunday, August 9, 2009

On this day 68 years ago

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I’ve been reading excerpts from four centuries of English diaries each day, following along in the Faber Book of Diaries.

Somewhat comforting to think that we all have similar problems, no matter the year or how famous we may be. For example, 68 years ago today Noel Coward noted in his diary that “Obviously, no matter how hard I work, I shall never be able to save any money.”

Next four churches in the Church Visiting series

Our Father-Mother God, all-harmonious

I attend the First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Haddonfield, NJ, where I listen to lots of very soothing reading on the topic of Truth.

Here comes my Lord, on a cross

I attend Kingsway Assembly of God Church, in Cherry Hill, NJ, where I hear two pastors give impassioned exhortations concerning the Lord’s supper.

I was moved in the Lord’s power to thresh their chaffy, light minds

I attend Haddonfield Friends meeting, where I sit in comfortable silence in a very old meetinghouse, inspect the graffiti carved into the old pews, and listen to some thoughts on death. I read George Fox’s Autobiography in preparation for this visit, and am dumbstruck.

If I Could Hie to Kolob

I attend the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Cherry Hill, NJ in another attempt to see an entire Mormon service. Again I arrive at the wrong time.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

This is in no way an ecumenical event


Covenant Presbyterian Church
Cherry Hill, NJ
July 15, 2007


In July I attended another type of Presbyterian Church, a congregation in the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA) denomination. This group formed in the 1970s, coming together as a group of churches affiliated with other Presbyterian groups but unhappy with liberal tendencies among those churches, such as ordination of women and rejection of Biblical inerrancy. Many people also believe that they were upset by the mainstream church’s opposition to the war in Vietnam and support for the civil rights movement and the Equal Rights Amendment. The PCA has been concentrated in the deep South, with headquarters in Georgia, although the denomination has many evangelical and missionary outreaches to other areas of the country. They have about 330,000 members in the US -- a rather small group.

Sweet yellow cherry tomatoes

Today I went to the local Farmers’ Market. It’s crowded, so I had to park a few blocks away. On my walk, I happened to notice this garden, which seemed to be bursting through the white fence:

Garden bursting through fence

I walked around to the side, and was able to see into the yard:

August Saturday 004

How lovely!

In front, the owners of the house seemed to be having a quiet brunch on their beautiful porch:

brunch on porch

I love these small New Jersey towns.

Back home, I unloaded my haul from the market:

August Saturday 009

August Saturday 008

Everything looks good, but the yellow cherry tomatoes are the real find today – wonderful flavor!! I made a tomato, basil, and mozzarella salad for lunch:

August Saturday 011

What a nice start to the weekend!

Violent crime rate tracks lead poisoning levels two decades earlier




"Although crime did fall dramatically in New York during Giuliani's tenure, a broad range of scientific research has emerged in recent years to show that the mayor deserves only a fraction of the credit that he claims. The most compelling information has come from an economist in Fairfax who has argued in a series of little-noticed papers that the "New York miracle" was caused by local and federal efforts decades earlier to reduce lead poisoning.


The theory offered by the economist, Rick Nevin, is that lead poisoning accounts for much of the variation in violent crime in the United States. It offers a unifying new neurochemical theory for fluctuations in the crime rate, and it is based on studies linking children's exposure to lead with violent behavior later in their lives.


What makes Nevin's work persuasive is that he has shown an identical, decades-long association between lead poisoning and crime rates in nine countries. "It is stunning how strong the association is," Nevin said in an interview. "Sixty-five to ninety percent or more of the substantial variation in violent crime in all these countries was explained by lead."


. . . Most of the theories [on why crime has declined in recent decades] have been long on intuition and short on evidence. Nevin says his data not only explain the decline in crime in the 1990s, but the rise in crime in the 1980s and other fluctuations going back a century. His data from multiple countries, which have different abortion rates, police strategies, demographics and economic conditions, indicate that lead is the only explanation that can account for international trends.


Because the countries phased out lead at different points, they provide a rigorous test: In each instance, the violent crime rate tracks lead poisoning levels two decades earlier. [italics added] "

Article in Washington Post

I find this fascinating, and immensely disturbing. Disturbing because it’s more evidence (to me, at least) for a wholly materialistic theory of personality. In addition, although I’m happy to be a Presbyterian, I don’t find this particular kind of predestination very comforting.


The fact that minute amounts of various chemicals can have profound effects upon our personalities – you might as well say upon our souls – is something that anyone interested in theorizing about sin and responsibility should find very, very troubling. We have abundant evidence that it’s so – just look at antidepressants and various other mood-altering chemicals, including such stand-bys as alcohol. There’s also the evidence of inherited genetic defects, and problems of metabolism, and so on.


Sometimes an invisible miniature alteration to a gene or bond or process somewhere in these astounding bodies of ours has profound effects upon stuff that we like to think of as immaterial and also basically under our control – our wishes, thoughts, habits, inclinations, personalities, abilities, moods, -- ourselves.


The older I get, the less I am inclined to think we should punish folks who have trouble doing the right thing. The more I am inclined to think, “There but by the grace of God (or my metabolism, or my genes) go I.”


I am reminded of a friend who has worked for many years with the mentally ill homeless and semi-homeless population in Philadelphia, who says that at the end of it all, her conclusion is “They’re doing the best they can. We’re all doing the best we can. But it’s a lot harder for them than for us.”


Photo courtesy Flickruser Dominic's pics

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Schiller had spent the last 25 years of his life creating the pins, using a tool too small to be seen by the naked eye.

Convicted forger, in Sing Sing, etching the Lord's Prayer onto the heads of seven pins - six silver and one gold.

According to the link, the work caused him to go blind.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Do snails bore?




Buckland learnedly suggested something about snails which he discovered at the bottom of some extensive limestone borings near Boulogne. This led to a learned disquisition on snails, as to how they bored & where they bored, & why they bored & whether they really bored, or no.

Thought I, if they don't, I know who does.


Diary entry for this day in 1841, by Barclay Fox, from The Faber Book of Diaries, one of the books I picked up in Maine.

The book presents short entries from four centuries of English diaries, written by more than 100 people.

I didn't know who Barclay Fox (1817-1855)was, so I checked trusty old Wikipedia, and learned that he was a businessman, gardener, and diarist, a member of the Quaker Fox family of Falmouth.

So, exactly 168 years ago, an English Quaker was being bored by a learned acquaintance, and I can read about it today.

Something about all this reminds me of blogs, and blog postings, and how the things we jot down at random might have a life of their own of which we little dream. I sometimes think that the blogs of today will become a trove of information about people in our time for the historians and e-archaeologists of the future. What wouldn't we give now for a record of the daily musings and doings of some ancient Egyptian or Babylonian?

Historians of the future, if you are reading this, hello!

Photo courtesy of Flickr user Mara~earth light~

Average churches filled with non-average churchgoers

Great post on church membership statistics and how to interpret them, by Michael Bell guest-posting at Internet Monk.

It turns out that the average church is small (either about 75 people or 185 people, depending on how you count), but that the average churchgoer attends a large church.

How can this be? Well, that’s what happens when about half the churchgoers in the US are found in less than 10% of the churches.

Bell explains it very clearly and well – the post is a great demonstration of how to write clearly about a difficult topic like statistics.

As Bell points out, these facts have huge implications for denominations and for pastors. He poses the example of a denomination in which half the members attend a single church (not so unlikely), and asks:

“If half your denomination goes to one church, what do you do when it comes to denominational decision making? One church, one vote? You are then saying that half your people don’t really have any say. One person, one vote, or one pastor, one vote? Then one church wields an inordinate amount of influence within the denomination. And what happens if that one church doesn’t like the direction that the denomination is headed? If it leaves, you lose half of your denomination, half your support for your national office, half of your support for your missionaries, half your support for your educational institutions.”

How does this affect seminaries and pastors?

“. . . if these students [seminarians] come from churches in the same proportions as church attenders, then 50% of seminary students come from roughly 8% to 9% of the churches. Their life experience in church is with larger churches. If they are initially placed as an associate, they will be building on their experience in other large churches. Yet, 90 percent of senior pastoral positions are in churches less than 350 people, and 50 percent of senior pastoral positions are in churches less than 75 people.”

Very, very interesting stuff.

So during my year of visiting churches I was usually seeing average churches filled with non-average church members. Or non-average churches filled with average church members.

Monday, July 27, 2009

The crow paradox



OK, I found this story on NPR just fascinating. Crows can tell individual humans apart, and can hold a grudge against certain people, for years. But we can't tell them apart.


I took the test. On the first crow, I scored miserably. On the second crow line-up, I got it right the first time. On the third crow, I got it right after four tries. Not so good.


Photo courtesy Flickr user hashmil


Sunday, July 26, 2009

Enter into the silence, part two

Matins begin at 8:30 am, and the Divine Liturgy at 9:30. I arrive a few minutes before 8:30, planning to see the whole thing. This is a large, attractive red brick structure with a big parking lot, in a very nice residential neighborhood. A sign in front reads “Happy birthday, America.” The odd thing, though, is that there are only two other cars in the parking lot.

I drive around the neighborhood a couple of times, but each time I return to the church there are still only the two cars. In the narthex, I see a table holding lots of thin yellow candles next to an offering plate. I put in a dollar and take a candle. There are two tables with shallow sandboxes on either side of the doors to the nave. Someone has drawn a cross in the center of each sandbox, and there are three lit candles stuck into the sand at the tips of the crosses. I light my candle from one of those, and stand it near the back of the box. I hope this is OK. It seems like the thing to do – or else I’ve messed up their display somehow. No one is around for me to ask about this.

I think I am supposed to venerate an icon before entering the sanctuary, but the idea is so foreign to me that I just make the sign of the cross, open the door and walk in.

The nave is a beautiful room, octagonal in shape, with a center aisle and rows of pews, and a gorgeous painted domed ceiling depicting Christ Pantocrator (ruler of all). There are stained glass windows all around, with representations of saints and of scenes from the life of Christ. (The nativity is shown as occurring not in a stable but in a cave.) The pulpit is really impressive – an elaborate carved wooden thing, with a matching carved canopy above. The iconostasion is enormous, stretching across the entire front of the chancel. It must be at least eight feet tall. I can just see an altar table behind the iconostasion, through the center door, which is partially open. I sit down near the back.

I am the only person in the pews, in a church that could seat at least 350. This seems odd. But there is some kind of activity going on. A young man is moving things up front. A woman brings out a silver tray with a cloth on it, and sets that on a table near the front. Two older men stand near a sort of raised reading stand on which several books have been placed. It’s like an upright lazy Susan – they can spin the stand to access different books as they need them. There is what seems to be an icon made of silver standing on a table off to one side, with a candle burning in front of it, and the young man venerates it at one point.

Then the young man brings me a book – an enormous book, titled Orthros 1994. It is opened to the prayers for the day, printed in Greek and English. I thank him and think, this is great, I’ll be able to follow along if I can at least transliterate the Greek.

The two older men begin chanting. They chant very loudly and very fast. Although they take turns, they have a system whereby one man starts before the other one has finished, so that there is no break in the sound – it’s one unbroken loop of chanting. If one person were doing this, it would be impossible to maintain – you’d have to stop and take a breath now and then. But it seems that two people can sustain this solid wall of sound indefinitely. The men are turning the spinning reading stand with practiced ease, moving from chant to chant. I try to follow along in the book I’ve been given, but constantly lose track of where they are in their rapid chanting.

The weekly bulletin is printed in two columns, English and Greek. There is no order of service in the bulletin, just a list of “The Propers Today” (apparently they call the readings propers), information about the ecclesiastical calendar (today is the Feast of St. Prokopios, the patron saint of marriage), and information about this year’s summer camp.

The priest, Father Emmanuel Pratsinakis, is doing something behind the iconostasion. At times I can see his back, and I can sometimes hear him chanting or praying quietly (I think he is miked). I am still the only person in the pews, and I am sorry to think that I may be disturbing these men, which is not what I wanted to do.

Some parts of the Matins celebrate the finding of the Holy Cross by the blessed Helena, and the finding of the Precious Nails. A woman enters the sanctuary, carrying a large silver platter, which she sets in a pew. She venerates an icon and leaves again. The young man who gave me the Orthros appears again, now wearing a black robe. He picks up the platter and sets it on a table near the back. He then begins a lengthy process of setting up a table with tablecloths, candlesticks, a cross, and an elevated platform for the platter. The priest disappears for a while and comes back wearing new clothes – a long white robe this time. He does more praying or chanting, with his back to us.

About thirty minutes into the prayers, a man and woman (separately) enter from the back and take seats in the pews. So now there are three of us. A few more people enter. We all stand.

Father Pratsinakis is wearing a different robe now, embroidered with red crosses! People are walking forward and venerating an icon. The priest walks around the altar, down the middle aisle, and through the vestibule waving a censer and wafting fragrant aromas. At the end of this ceremony we sit again. The chanting from the front has not ceased. I peek behind me and notice that there are now many more burning candles in the little sandboxes in the vestibule.

By 9:30 there are six women and eight men in the pews. At about 9:50 there are approximately twenty people in the building, and the priest announces that the service is beginning. The two men are still ceaselessly chanting. The priest is also chanting, behind the iconostasion, and at some point he switches from Greek to English. He manages to make the word God have seven syllables – Go-o-o-o-o-o-od.

An acolyte comes out wearing a gorgeous, gorgeous golden robe. The cantors are now reading in both Greek and English, still very fast. One reading is about the gifts of the Spirit. The priest goes back behind the iconostasis, entering through the Beautiful Gate (the various openings have names). There are readings from Romans 12:6-14 (we all have different gifts), and Matthew 9:1-8 (healing of a paralytic).

People continue to arrive and sit in the pews. Father Pratsinakis comes out from behind the iconostasion and stands in the middle of the aisle to deliver his homily. It seems to me that preaching from a pulpit is going out of favor in American churches – even though this church has a humdinger of a pulpit, it’s not being used.

The sanctuary is filling up now – there are probably well over a hundred people. I notice that the women are wearing dresses, and I’m glad that I wore a skirt to this service.

The homily begins with a tiny bit of bragging – it’s difficult for someone who doesn’t know Greek to appreciate the passages for today, because some of the words and phrases used in the original are not fully translatable. Luckily, in this church we know Greek. Father Pratsinakis has a terrific speaking voice, and no Greek accent at all. (I wonder if he has a New Jersey accent when he speaks Greek.)

The topics of the homily are friendship (the paralytic man was brought to Jesus by his friends) and faith, which cannot exist in a life of solitude. There is always a social dimension to faith. A third point is that Jesus told the paralytic to take heart – the priest tells us not to let ourselves slump into depression or be consumed by our problems. We have no reason to become depressed or to feel insignificant if we look to Jesus. The homily is about ten minutes long. When he finishes it in English, he does it once again, this time in Greek. He seems to be more animated and louder when speaking Greek.

Next is the Great Entrance. The priest brings out holy gifts (covered dishes), and the acolyte walks backward before him, swinging the censer. More prayers are said, in Greek and English. One of the prayers asks for “a Christian end to our lives, peaceful, without shame and suffering, and for a good account before God.”

It is 10:50, and people are still arriving. About this time they seem to be getting ready for Communion. Another surprise – this is the first time I’ve ever witnessed paedocommunion – the practice of giving the elements to children, even babies. It’s very interesting. The priest has a long-handled spoon, something like an iced tea spoon, and he very expertly flips a drop of wine into the mouths of the babies and children who are brought forward, without touching the spoon to their lips. One young man, probably about two years old, pitches a fit, and his mother has to wrestle him into an immobile position so that the priest can flip the wine into his very wide-open, loud mouth.

I can see why churches might have wanted to discontinue paedocommunion. Roman Catholics dropped paedocommunion after about the first thousand years of Christianity, around the time of the Great Schism, when the western and eastern churches divided. However, for the first thousand years of Christianity paedocommunion was common in most churches. Some of the Eastern churches in full communion with Rome restored the practice of paedocommunion after Vatican II. More recently, some conservative Protestant denominations have begun practicing paedocommunion.

I’m not sure if I’m seeing this correctly, but it appears to me that people are picking up some rather large chunks of bread (Orthodox churches use leavened bread) at the Communion table, and carrying them back to their seats in the pews, eating them as they go. These are big pieces, not the kind of thing you can swallow in one bite. Can this be what is really happening, or am I misinterpreting this? This is really the most unusual Communion service of all I have seen so far – and it may very well be the most traditional!

At 11:00 there is a little ceremony around the table up front that had been set up earlier with a platter, candles, and so on. It seems to be some kind of memorial service, but the whole thing is rather mysterious to me. The offering is taken next, using baskets on long poles. After that the priest stands in the middle aisle and people line up on either side. They kiss his rings, and he hands them very large chunks of bread (using both hands for both lines of people). Is this another kind of communion? Whatever it is, people are now coming down the aisle again carrying bread, sometimes handfuls of it. Everyone seems to be having a good time, and enjoying this part of the service, whatever it is.

There’s an announcement about how they need more people to bake for the upcoming agora ( kind of annual bazaar), and then everyone exits. People are standing around the vestibule, chatting and eating chunks of bread. I leave the Orthos that was so kindly provided for me in the pew, and stand in the vestibule for a while. No one says anything, so I ask if there is a washroom, and someone points me downstairs. (Can you tell that I've hit upon the technique of asking directions to the washroom at the end of every service to let people know that a visitor is in the building?)

I go back up to the vestibule and stand around some more, but no one says anything. They are really all quite busy talking among themselves, in Greek and in English, and many people are hurrying out to their cars. So I walk back out to the parking lot, where more people are standing around talking and eating chunks of bread. They are all having a good time being Greek together.

There was no chance for any follow-up, as there was no visitor’s card to fill out.

In October I did go back for the Agora, which is a huge event. I can see why it takes a year to prepare. Enormous tents are set up on the church grounds, and under them are places where you can buy icons and other artwork. There are several areas where you can buy food and drink (including ouzo), and tables at which to sit and eat. Inside one room of the building they have created a Greek deli, with cases of cheese and various prepared dishes. There are literally hundreds of people here in the middle of the day, and I think the big crowd comes at night, for the dancing and music. I bought raffle tickets to win a trip to Greece (didn’t win), and walked through the building.

Parts of it contain museum-like displays of traditional Greek clothing. Two nice Greek ladies were in the sanctuary, and they offered me some of those big chunks of bread I had seen people eating during the service. They said it is called the Bread of Fellowship. It’s slightly sweet, very good.

It seems to me that this would be a hard church to join if you’re not Greek; the assumption seems to be that if you join you want not only to worship with this congregation, but to become more involved with your Greek heritage. The church offers classes for non-Greeks who marry Greeks, so that they can assimilate.

Here's the thing that sticks with me - what's this idea about entering into the silence? This was several hours of unbroken sound!! (Must be a metaphorical idea about silence.)